Amazon g5.xlarge

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAmazon g5.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1248 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 22:54
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7R32
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 175
64% 113 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 267
36% 266 Pts
64-Core 264
16% 264 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia A10G
Nvidia(10DE 152F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1710 MHz, MLim: 3125 MHz, Ram: 22.5GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 270
Reflection 243
Parallax 300
220% 271 fps
MRender 234
Gravity 223
Splatting 162
164% 206 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 181%
Great: 193%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 250GB
233GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 155 155 155 155 155 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.3% Excellent
Read 592
Write 259
Mixed 469
SusWrite 158
82% 369 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 42.6
140% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 177
133% 180 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 96%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 188GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 172
Mixed 139
SusWrite 127
108% 145 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 5.5
1,037% 6.2 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
83.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 39.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 31
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical g5.xlarge Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

System: Amazon g5.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback