Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	89.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	37.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221028
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 07 '23 at 17:26
Run Duration	408 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 5700 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 76.9 1-Core 133 2-Core 237 83% 149 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 337 46% 341 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-$275 75,918 User benchmarks, average bench 85% PowerColor(148C 2399) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Lighting 114 Reflection 129 Parallax 172 93% 138 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 126 Splatting 80.2 84% 105 fps
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 91%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe RGB 1TB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 260GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 960 739 772 587 557 741 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 612 Write 2,013 Mixed 643 SusWrite 726 228% 998 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 57.2 179% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,164 DQ Write 895 DQ Mixed 1,075 792% 1,045 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 232GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 294 290 295 295 295 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 450 Mixed 369 SusWrite 311 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 55.9 186% 63.8 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 219 165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 124%
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB 44,174 User benchmarks, average bench 268% 484GB free Firmware: P9CR30A SusWrite @10s intervals: 2286 2321 2333 2333 2283 2312 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	353% Outstanding	Read 1,879 Write 2,378 Mixed 2,007 SusWrite 2,311 486% 2,144 MB/s	4K Read 53.6 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 79.3 268% 98.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,278 DQ Write 1,135 DQ Mixed 1,207 905% 1,207 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 353% Great: 394%
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 1TB 6,131 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 589GB free Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1590 1010 1011 1011 1002 1010 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	250% Outstanding	Read 1,322 Write 2,461 Mixed 1,529 SusWrite 1,106 364% 1,605 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 171 4K Mixed 77.7 255% 97.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,141 DQ Write 1,103 DQ Mixed 1208 884% 1,151 MB/s
Poor: 133% ↑ This bench: 250% Great: 287%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 66GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 297 297 297 297 297 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 451 Mixed 366 SusWrite 314 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 42.8 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 55.1 183% 62.6 MB/s	DQ Read 245 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 218 164% 220 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 614GB free Firmware: CC64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 174 174 171 174 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 177 Write 105 Mixed 61.7 SusWrite 173 94% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 112%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EZAZ-00Z 4TB 965 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 182 180 180 182 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 160 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 180 103% 142 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 631% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4R.M16FE1 4x16GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	MC Read 39.7 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 39.3 98% 34.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 33.7 76% 26.8 GB/s	Latency 86.5 46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 123%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,647x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,263x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $144Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,413x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,237x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,075x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,469x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16