Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X507UAR
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190521
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 12:01
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4417U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 41.5
1-Core 58.9
2-Core 84.1
37% 61.5 Pts
4-Core 72.6
8-Core 87.8
10% 80.2 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Asus(1043 1311) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7372
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 3.2
1% 2.7 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 4.3
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 47 75 65 54 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 309
Write 231
Mixed 126
SusWrite 68.8
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 10.8
31% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 62.4
DQ Mixed 80.6
64% 91.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8001 R744G2133S1S 8GB
2400, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 7.7
17% 6.03 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 4
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 195
20% 195 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR Builds (Compare 357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X507UAR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback