Dell Latitude E5540

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Latitude E5540  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0D881V
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '23 at 04:31
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 91.3
43% 68 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 138
20% 147 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720M
Dell(1028 05E0) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 2
4% 3.6 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox SD250-480GB 480GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 247 233 40 67 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 386
Write 293
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 112
46% 211 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 1
30% 9.97 MB/s
DQ Read 56.2
DQ Write 41.7
DQ Mixed 1.2
14% 33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 94%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
705GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 93 91 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 171
Write 91.2
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 93.5
136% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-427.A00LF Hynix 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 13.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5540 Builds (Compare 871 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5540

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback