Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer/3.1  (all builds)
Memory49.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 21:19
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697A v4
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.1% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 78.1
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 770
61% 540 Pts
64-Core 1,978
122% 1,978 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
850GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,979
Write 1,796
Mixed 890
344% 1,555 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 38.6
127% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 562
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 469
341% 449 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 300%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 214
Write 172
Mixed 87.5
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40DB0-CPB 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 55
MC Write 51.4
MC Mixed 45.7
145% 50.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 32 0" 1280 720
Typical X99M Killer/3.1 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer/3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $626
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback