Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 04:22
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 633
70% 553 Pts
64-Core 695
43% 695 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 174
Parallax 127
100% 141 fps
MRender 178
Gravity 119
Splatting 104
106% 134 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 108 88 70 57 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 437
Write 369
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 83.8
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 13.9
82% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 19.3
77% 166 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
239GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 133 132 138 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62% Good
Read 82.5
Write 73.8
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 133
68% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
201% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
459GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 95 94 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 92.8
SusWrite 95.2
73% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
402GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 132 132 134 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 154
Mixed 98.6
SusWrite 133
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX3200C18D4/8G KHX3200C18D4/8G KHX2133C14/8G KHX2133C14/8G 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 35.4
MC Mixed 28.2
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 36.6
SC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 18% 39 102 60 60 23.5" 1920 1057 SAM0D20 S24F350
Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $559
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback