Asus M32CD4-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus M32CD4-K  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD4-K
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 13:50
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 61.3
1-Core 24.6
2-Core 95.1
37% 60.3 Pts
4-Core 128
8-Core 235
22% 182 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Asus(1043 203B) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.9% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 30.8
25% 31.4 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 32.6
Splatting 23.3
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA15.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 113 6.5 109 6.9 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.8% Average
Read 197
Write 98.7
Mixed 279
SusWrite 95.8
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 20.8
65% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 218
157% 202 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
4GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 28 29 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 16.7
Write 30.8
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 28.7
20% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
87% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion HDD 6TB
79GB free
Firmware: 1801
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 77 76 81 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 61.2
Write 100
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 76.8
49% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
35GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 73 59 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Read 49
Write 74.5
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 66.3
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
78% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 66%
WD My Book 25ED 6TB
61GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 40 40 40 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 37.7
Write 39.6
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 40
52% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.6
212% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
3GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 34 33 33 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 50
Write 33.8
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 32.5
46% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.8
58% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB
1GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 108
Mixed 22.1
92% 78 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
18GB free, PID a300
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 140 100 123 125 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 136
Write 133
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 120
132% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 4TB
113GB free, PID a300
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 98 125 95 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 101
Write 92
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 94.7
94% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 23
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 10.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 171
23% 171 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 34 60 27" 1280 720 SAM7097 LF27T450F
Typical M32CD4-K Builds (Compare 689 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus M32CD4-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $196
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback