Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive287% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211202
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 13:33
Run Duration335 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600KF-$159
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Memory 73.5
1-Core 183
2-Core 362
107% 206 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 1,165
111% 918 Pts
64-Core 1,668
103% 1,668 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 213
Parallax 204
182% 214 fps
MRender 204
Gravity 157
Splatting 137
132% 166 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
473GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1298 1027 1028 1011 1012 1008 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
287% Outstanding
Read 2,238
Write 1,856
Mixed 1,476
SusWrite 1064
371% 1,659 MB/s
4K Read 54.8
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 77
250% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,216
915% 1,228 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 287%
Great: 372%
Mushkin Callisto Deluxe 120GB-$62
38GB free
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 91 94 95 92 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 162
Write 110
Mixed 121
SusWrite 93.3
27% 122 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 26.4
112% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.9
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 62.5
59% 91.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 57%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
55GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 107 117 115 113 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 420
Mixed 305
SusWrite 114
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 94.8
4K Mixed 50.2
178% 62.3 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 151
148% 235 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 108%
ST18000NM002J-2TV133 18TB
17TB free
Firmware: PAL7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 262 263 262 264 263 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 246
Write 252
Mixed 126
SusWrite 263
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 0.1
50% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.1
DQ Write 17.6
DQ Mixed 0.3
3% 6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 43%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
453GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 77 79 77 79 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 81.9
Write 60.6
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 76.9
52% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 85 83 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 138
Write 137
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 84.3
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
698GB free
Firmware: AR17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 147 148 147 147 147 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 87%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$166
6.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 180 187 178 179 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 152
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 178
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.1
308% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 110%
Toshiba MG04ACA600A 6TB
1TB free
Firmware: FS3B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 107 117 115 113 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 133
Write 140
Mixed 89.1
SusWrite 114
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 115%
Seagate ST6000NM0024-1HT17Z 6TB
337GB free
Firmware: PN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 101 104 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
71% Very good
Read 142
Write 146
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 104
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
221% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71%
Great: 119%
Hitachi HUS726060ALA640 6TB
477GB free
Firmware: AHGNT1EN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 107 117 115 113 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 116
Write 123
Mixed 48.6
SusWrite 114
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
68.7% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 24.9
MC Mixed 24.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 17.7
56% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 LHC2701 42890
Typical Z690 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 164%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $746
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback