Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory110.4 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '23 at 13:26
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 77.3
2-Core 156
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 509
48% 396 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 11.2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 74.3
41% 59.2 fps
MRender 63
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 50.3
47% 58 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 94 138 121 146 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adata XPG SX900 512GB-$189
397GB free
Firmware: 3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 25 24 22 9.3 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 188
Write 208
Mixed 195
SusWrite 30.4
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 16.9
42% 13.5 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 81
DQ Mixed 93.9
73% 102 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 69%
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$71
80GB free
Firmware: 6B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 353 308 313 313 311 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 438
Write 397
Mixed 376
SusWrite 334
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 36.3
121% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 108
126% 220 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 127%
HitaHUA721010KLA 1TB
151GB free
Firmware: AC4A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 52 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 53.9
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 52.3
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 46%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
24GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 53 58 55 53 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 50.1
Write 71.5
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 54.5
45% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.4
132% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 66%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB
772GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 71 71 69 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
44.6% Average
Read 84
Write 95.9
Mixed 67
SusWrite 70.7
59% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.7
172% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GL7MMR4N-TF 4x31.8GB
4 of 16 slots used
127GB RIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.2% Above average
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 19.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 17.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 57 28 60 23" 1280 720 ACR0504 R231
Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback