Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '24 at 11:50
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$130
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 236
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 321
42% 318 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
Zotac(19DA 1281) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 22.8
14% 20 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 20.3
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3SMN2HTH3BT240GB 240GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0105A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 62 38 66 48 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 409
Write 85.9
Mixed 66.4
SusWrite 54.4
33% 154 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 1.5
44% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 38.8
DQ Mixed 0.3
21% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 79%
Samsung HD322HJ 120GB
103GB free
Firmware: HPS2227P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 256 260 310 320 293 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 348
Write 256
Mixed 268
SusWrite 284
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 8.3
78% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 13
61% 131 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 60%
SSD 120GB 320GB
236GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 103 107 106 104 104 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 87.8
Write 97.7
Mixed 56.6
SusWrite 104
20% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
3% 1.23 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
38.5% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.6
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 9 0 72.3" 1280 720 LED0001 TV-PHILCO
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback