Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '18 at 09:44
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 569
52% 433 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
MSI(1462 2366) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 390.65
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.94
8% 9.5 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 9.8
Splatting 10.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M7VC 256GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 510
Write 198
Mixed 142
62% 283 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 54.1
4K Mixed 23
102% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 131
DQ Mixed 11.6
56% 130 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
818GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 143
Write 141
Mixed 135
105% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
742GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 148
Write 148
Mixed 141
110% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 2.73
4K Mixed 0.38
138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
394GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 130
Mixed 124
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.17
80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingmax GLLG42F-18---------- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 9.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 3.8
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,378 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $646
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback