Asrock 890GM Pro3 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 890GM Pro3 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111004
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '18 at 04:37
Run Duration355 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 49.4
2-Core 98.8
50% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 175
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4290
ASRock(1849 9714) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.87
Reflection 1.92
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 1.52
1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ACSC2M128S25 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.095.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29% Poor
Read 219
Write 100
Mixed 142
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 1.55
43% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 32.8
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 4.95
18% 37.6 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 29%
Great: 65%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
268GB free
Firmware: GM4OA5CA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 64.7
Write 66.6
Mixed 21.8
37% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.44
4K Mixed 0.3
79% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 51%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
233GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 94.7
Write 83.8
Mixed 94.7
69% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.42
101% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
220GB free
Firmware: 07.04C07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 71
Write 58.9
Mixed 71.5
51% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.43
98% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$25
84GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 53.9
Mixed 56.2
43% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.95
4K Mixed 0.34
94% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 69%
FNK TECH USB CARD READER 32GB
30GB free, PID 0300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
4.41% Terrible
Read 14.1
Write 6.21
Mixed 7.49
10% 9.26 MB/s
4K Read 3.81
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.08
18% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.41%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.3% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 8.6
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 890GM Pro3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 890GM Pro3 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback