PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 76% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Biostar TP67B+ (all builds) |
Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20110217 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 18 '16 at 11:22 |
Run Duration | 85 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
|
77.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
53.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 13x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 6x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 6x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 3x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 3x |
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $776 |