Asus P5KPL-CM

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	8.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-CM (all builds)
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100827
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 04 '18 at 00:36
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9500 5,111 User benchmarks, average bench 48% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.85 GHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	48.4% Average	Memory 70 1-Core 39.8 2-Core 80 41% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 158 8-Core 154 21% 156 Pts	64-Core 156 10% 156 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 381.65 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Lighting 9.57 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 8.09 8% 9.6 fps	MRender 12.8 Gravity 9.87 Splatting 10.7 9% 11.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03070009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 44 47 48 47 46 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	32.4% Below average	Read 227 Write 45.3 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 46.1 21% 95.2 MB/s	4K Read 30.8 4K Write 8.1 4K Mixed 12.4 67% 17.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.7 DQ Write 7 DQ Mixed 13.7 12% 18.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 85%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 250GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 233GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 23 24 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.09% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 23.8 Mixed 18 SusWrite 23 29% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.09% Great: 262%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 5.4 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 3.2 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 101 39% 101 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-CM Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-CM

CPU
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	15x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	11x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	4x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $35Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	88x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	9x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $85

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16