Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory23.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 21:38
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 69
1-Core 98
2-Core 193
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 656
64% 524 Pts
64-Core 1,037
64% 1,037 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.6% Very good
Lighting 84.3
Reflection 88.8
Parallax 175
69% 116 fps
MRender 86.8
Gravity 117
Splatting 126
92% 110 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 239 218 219 252 251 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 478
Mixed 392
SusWrite 264
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 53.3
178% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 363
272% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
17GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 244 243 209 240 242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 385
Write 226
Mixed 246
SusWrite 228
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 38.6
141% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 228
174% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 88%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
173GB free
Firmware: DXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 219 210 197 185 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 478
Write 250
Mixed 176
SusWrite 204
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 79.8
4K Mixed 23.6
114% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 57.2
104% 209 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
140GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 62 62 60 62 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 68.3
Mixed 52
SusWrite 60.8
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 165 165 164 164 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 134
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 163
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 114%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB
302GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 35
Write 31.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 16.3
36% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13%
Great: 31%
USB Flash Memory 8GB
3GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Read 18.7
Write 11.5
Mixed 8.8
SusWrite 11.8
16% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
34% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 7%
USB Flash Memory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 5.5 6.8 7.8 6.6 6.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 5.3
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.6
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 7%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 160GB
125GB free, PID 2100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 15 15 16 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 30
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 15.4
32% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.6% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 24.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 22.8
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback