Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140930
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '16 at 12:21
Run Duration1128 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 436
58% 437 Pts
64-Core 440
27% 440 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3201) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6175
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 43.7
Reflection 42.6
Parallax 37.4
36% 41.3 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 38
Splatting 34
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 394
Mixed 202
81% 365 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 39.9
168% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 278
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 114
124% 208 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 106%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 113
Write 114
Mixed 6.3
56% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.21
90% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
791GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 108
Write 86.8
Mixed 4.65
48% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.2
71% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 67%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
790GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 156
Write 133
Mixed 48.1
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.51
138% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83%
Great: 76%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30
365GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.4% Above average
Read 88
Write 91.3
Mixed 26.9
50% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.19
58% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
6GB free
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 187
Write 118
Mixed 77.8
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.12
40% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 112%
Generic Flash Disk 537GB
499GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Read 15.2
Write 2.54
Mixed 2.7
6% 6.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.003
0% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 9%
INTEL SS DSC2CT240A4 240GB
78GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.9% Good
Read 40.7
Write 41.6
Mixed 40.9
53% 41 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 7.61
869% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 12.5
DQ Write 19.6
DQ Mixed 6.81
945% 13 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 127%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
30GB free, PID 0736
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 11.3
Mixed 13
17% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.66
4K Write 1.01
4K Mixed 0.81
79% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 19%
SAMSUNG MZ7PA128HMCD-010 128GB
24GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.8% Good
Read 41.1
Write 42
Mixed 40.6
53% 41.2 MB/s
4K Read 8.03
4K Write 16.5
4K Mixed 6.5
813% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 9.49
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 6.43
869% 11.3 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 68%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Read 39
Write 8.1
Mixed 9.97
18% 19 MB/s
4K Read 6.96
4K Write 0.09
4K Mixed 0.06
31% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 23%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
7GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
7.65% Terrible
Read 39
Write 4.54
Mixed 5.73
14% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.24
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.003
16% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.65%
Great: 22%
ST2000DL 001-9VT156 2TB
6GB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 89.7
Write 76.4
Mixed 27.4
75% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.09
4K Write 0.22
4K Mixed 0.06
10% 0.12 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
34.3% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.9
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback