Asus F1A75-M LE

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus F1A75-M LE (all builds)
Memory	2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140527
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 24 '18 at 20:53
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	MDA-User
Background CPU	82%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81 6,332 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	46.2% Average	Memory 66.3 1-Core 47.6 2-Core 99 44% 71 Pts	4-Core 150 8-Core 175 21% 162 Pts	64-Core 188 12% 188 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 56%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon HD 6550D 4,197 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 84C8) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.29% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 6.81 Parallax 6.72 4% 6.28 fps	MRender 4.19 Gravity 5.97 Splatting 5.26 4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.29% Great: 5%
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.3% Average	Lighting 50.1 Reflection 46.3 Parallax 70.4 41% 55.6 fps	MRender 77.4 Gravity 69.6 Splatting 63.6 57% 70.2 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 15103489 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 68478958575680 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1875 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 0 (B1) Unknown 0 0 143 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BD) vendor-specific 37 58 64428310565 (C2) HDA temperature 37 58 64428310565 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 15103489 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 15103489 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 15103489 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 1 1 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 84917 (EA) Unknown 0 0 0 (F1) Unknown 0 0 0 (F2) Unknown 0 0 0	31.9% Below average	Read 336 Write 19.7 Mixed 39.3 28% 132 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 10.5 44% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 19.5 DQ Mixed 48.5 45% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC4C Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 63552776 (03) Spinup time 94 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3730 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 68 55 81721400522 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7395 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2237 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 3 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 40 863944179751 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 662 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 72 72 57710 (C2) HDA temperature 39 60 -140737488355289 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -120263379250600 (F1) Unknown 100 253 -51211902114907 (F2) Unknown 100 253 -96526966789452
Poor: 51% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GB 402 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.3% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.3 18% 6.3 GB/s	Latency 111 36% 111 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical F1A75-M LE Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M LE

CPU
A6-3650 APUAMDBench 44%, 2,748 samples	9x
A8-3870 APUAMD $81Bench 47%, 6,332 samples	9x
A8-3850 APUAMD $80Bench 46%, 3,108 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon HD 6530DAMDBench 3%, 4,675 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6550DAMDBench 4%, 4,197 samples	5x
Radeon HD 6670AMDBench 6%, 32,193 samples	4x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	3x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	3x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	4x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 8GBNanyaBench 49%, 402 samples	4x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $35

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16