ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hp-pavilion AY604AA-ABL HPE-170f

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Hp-pavilion AY604AA-ABL HPE-170f (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON TRUCKEE
Memory	12.6 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091029
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '16 at 02:07
Run Duration	305 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 92.2 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 142 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 252 8-Core 357 38% 305 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Lighting 51.5 Reflection 35.4 Parallax 65.8 42% 50.9 fps	MRender 33.4 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 44.4 36% 43.1 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 117GB free Firmware: 580A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3614317 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -11330123725264 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 695 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 572 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 35 47 73017524259 (C2) HDA temperature 35 47 73017524259 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3614317 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3614317 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3614317 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 538 (EA) Unknown 0 0 456 (F1) Unknown 0 0 456 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1367	64.9% Good	Read 267 Write 253 Mixed 259 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 21.9 102% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 92.8 95% 154 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 94%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9542 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1063 (B1) Unknown 96 96 32 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 54 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 630 (F1) Unknown 99 99 944038440	39.7% Below average	Read 265 Write 43.1 Mixed 74.2 27% 128 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 40.1 4K Mixed 9.95 71% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 75.2 DQ Mixed 25.5 48% 100 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 73%
Esata-2 ExternalRAID 4TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Read 158 Write 124 Mixed 126 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 0.51 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 130%
Esata-2 ExternalRAID 4TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 610GB free Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 172 Write 133 Mixed 127 108% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1.36 4K Write 1.77 4K Mixed 0.36 129% 1.16 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 130%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 223GB free Firmware: MN6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 82 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387591594 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 476 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 135 135 26 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 8163 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 472 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 768 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 768 (C2) HDA temperature 166 166 210454118436 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	56.6% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 98.9 Mixed 78.4 69% 91.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.99 4K Write 2.12 4K Mixed 0.5 136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 85%
HGST G-RAID 4TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 850GB free, PID 8017 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Read 140 Write 73.7 Mixed 96.2 122% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1.03 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.21 34% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 77%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 133GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 72.6 Write 64 Mixed 62.7 84% 66.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 0.54 4K Mixed 0.24 29% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 59%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 89GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 63.1 Write 61 Mixed 46 71% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.61 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.31 61% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 18GB 8,131 User benchmarks, average bench 42% null MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	42.5% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 12 MC Mixed 15.7 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.7 SC Write 9.4 SC Mixed 11.1 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 63.7 63% 63.7 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback