HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	9.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z820 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158B
Memory	122.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140325
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Aug 26 '18 at 17:36
Run Duration	249 Seconds
Run User	SVN-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2 880 User benchmarks, average bench 74% CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 90.3 1-Core 106 2-Core 205 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 796 69% 590 Pts	64-Core 1947 120% 1947 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 079C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.33 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	9.66% Terrible	Lighting 8.43 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 19 7% 13.6 fps	MRender 21 Gravity 18.3 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 9.66% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 187 176 180 178 177 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 382 Write 328 Mixed 290 SusWrite 200 67% 300 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 64.9 4K Mixed 34.2 118% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 126 127% 201 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: HP34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 159 160 161 161 161 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 124 Mixed 90.5 SusWrite 159 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 198GB free Firmware: CC35 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 108 108 109 109 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 110 Write 106 Mixed 76 SusWrite 108 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS72101 1TB 1,439 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 138GB free Firmware: A39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 98 98 97 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Read 106 Write 109 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 97.4 68% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 505GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 167 166 172 170 168 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	94% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 113 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 168 87% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94% Great: 113%
ICY BOX0 IB-124CL-U3 1.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 163GB free Firmware: 0108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	10% Very poor	Read 22.5 Write 20.5 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 11.8 14% 18.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10% Great: 39%
Generic MassStorageClass 16GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 10GB free, PID 0746 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 25 25 24 25 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.7% Very poor	Read 81.2 Write 17 Mixed 15.8 SusWrite 24 36% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.6 90% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 27%
Samsung D3 Station 3TB 1,520 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 390GB free, PID 6124 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 20.3 Write 19.5 Mixed 19 SusWrite 11.4 24% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 134% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 79%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,602 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free, PID d011 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 22.2 Write 21 Mixed 20 SusWrite 11.4 25% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD 8x16GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 51 MC Write 34.9 MC Mixed 40.1 120% 42 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 3.9 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,754 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	146x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	67x

SSD
860 500GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,934 samples	55x
860 1TBSamsungBench 86%, 2,531 samples	37x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	32x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16