HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1495
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180510
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 23:16
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$186
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 96
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 451
51% 399 Pts
64-Core 470
29% 470 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
HP(103C 0936) 2GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.73
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 4.08
Parallax 4.59
4% 4.35 fps
MRender 5.19
Gravity 5.07
Splatting 7.04
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 111 121 144 137 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 153
Write 144
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 129
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 114%
HUAWEI TF CARD Storage 16GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.3 9.2 9.7 10 9.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Read 24.8
Write 9.3
Mixed 12.8
SusWrite 9.3
17% 14 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 2.5
193% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 8.1
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback