Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 74% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '18 at 18:10
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 74%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 117
2-Core 244
80% 146 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 825
79% 655 Pts
64-Core 1,050
65% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63% Good
Lighting 79.1
Reflection 80.2
Parallax 66.6
64% 75.3 fps
MRender 70.4
Gravity 74
Splatting 75.2
60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1349 305 305 309 308 309 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2115
Write 1,472
Mixed 923
SusWrite 481
276% 1,248 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 66.6
247% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 966
DQ Write 1,139
DQ Mixed 979
758% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 237%
Great: 280%
Adata XPG SX7000 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB
101GB free
Firmware: CB1.1.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 69 52 47 60 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 492
Write 431
Mixed 420
SusWrite 86.2
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 38.3
157% 63.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 19.4
80% 171 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 108%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
984GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 122 122 123 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 118
Write 123
Mixed 72
SusWrite 121
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 163 159 160 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 151
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 161
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 114%
Standard S-ATA Hard Drive 500GB
25GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 54 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.2% Poor
Read 94.2
Write 94.4
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 55.1
96% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$408
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.1% Very good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 23
86% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 9.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 696 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,131
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback