Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	114% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	17.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180314
Uptime	8.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '19 at 13:51
Run Duration	789 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$211 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 71.4 1-Core 120 2-Core 239 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 786 77% 633 Pts	64-Core 1,234 76% 1,234 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 5390) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	114% Outstanding	Lighting 150 Reflection 155 Parallax 143 122% 150 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 168 Splatting 116 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: M0CR060 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 2.2 275 188 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 437 Write 324 Mixed 305 SusWrite 77.6 64% 286 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 34.1 121% 45 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 96.1 DQ Mixed 38.9 36% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 98%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 126GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.1 459 445 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 428 Write 454 Mixed 311 SusWrite 151 75% 336 MB/s	4K Read 28.6 4K Write 89.4 4K Mixed 40.6 143% 52.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 112 DQ Mixed 42.2 41% 61.1 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 107%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$54 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 77GB free Firmware: M3CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 462 461 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 507 Write 450 Mixed 425 SusWrite 154 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 39.9 4K Write 90.8 4K Mixed 49.2 172% 60 MB/s	DQ Read 37.6 DQ Write 104 DQ Mixed 55.3 47% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 125%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 1,997 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 129 129 131 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	10.4% Very poor	Read 75.8 Write 75.5 Mixed 77 SusWrite 86.6 18% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 0.6 7% 3.7 MB/s	DQ Read 0.3 DQ Write 10.3 DQ Mixed 0.9 2% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.4% Great: 18%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 780GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 97 Write 99.8 Mixed 47.5 100% 81.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 40%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1.5TB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 95.7 Write 47.3 Mixed 49 73% 64 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 40%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 696GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 108 Write 53.2 Mixed 32 69% 64.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 97% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 48%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 787GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 88.2 Write 87.7 Mixed 52.2 94% 76 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3000C15D4/4GX CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 KHX3000C15D4/4GX CT8G4DFS824A.C8FHD1 24GB 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	73.1% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 26.8 MC Mixed 24.7 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 22.4 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16