MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7917
MotherboardMSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150811
Uptime15.2 Days
Run DateDec 29 '17 at 07:15
Run Duration293 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 88.4
1-Core 121
2-Core 233
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 630
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 610
38% 610 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
EVGA(3842 1970) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.9% Below average
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 55
Parallax 43.6
30% 45.1 fps
MRender 45.9
Gravity 20
Splatting 51.1
33% 39 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
902GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90% Excellent
Read 169
Write 145
Mixed 122
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.18
97% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90%
Great: 108%
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Read 131
Write 149
Mixed 116
99% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.54
4K Mixed 0.19
71% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 104%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
51GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 115
Write 121
Mixed 99.1
84% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.21
86% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 108%
ST2000DL 004 HD204UI 2TB
667GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 42.2
Mixed 37.1
51% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.88
4K Mixed 0.41
114% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 38%
SAMSUNG HD753LJ 750GB
218GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 38.4
Write 40.3
Mixed 38.8
51% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.46
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 42%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
187GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 39.2
Mixed 35.5
48% 37.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.32
83% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 42%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB
16GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 32
Write 34.3
Mixed 29.7
41% 32 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.37
61% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.1% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917) Builds (Compare 6,795 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI Z97 GAMING 5 (MS-7917)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $648
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback