Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision Tower 5810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 5810  (all builds)
Memory119.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 25 '19 at 12:29
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 199
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 516
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 37.4
32% 35.9 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 38.2
Splatting 35.8
29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 284 299 260 226 235 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 418
Write 453
Mixed 238
SusWrite 267
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 35.5
129% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 293
226% 309 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
907GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 362 391 415 413 433 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 463
Mixed 424
SusWrite 397
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 53.9
182% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 357
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$85
648GB free
Firmware: M0CR040
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 352 353 271 267 275 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 409
Write 452
Mixed 373
SusWrite 312
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 35.6
126% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 327
248% 333 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 104%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 41 41 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 41.2
Mixed 32.3
SusWrite 41.3
28% 38.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
455% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 69%
Asmt ASM1352-PM 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 40
Mixed 33
SusWrite 40.5
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9965662-016.A00G 9965600-033.A00G 9965662-016.A00G 9965662-016.A00G 9965662-016.A00G 9965600-033.A00G 9965662-016.A00G 9965662-016.A00G 128GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 43.8
MC Mixed 36.7
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 22.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $76
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback