Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 157%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive197% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory52.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230201
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 21 '23 at 19:50
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 232
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 734
72% 591 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 301
Parallax 376
233% 321 fps
MRender 365
Gravity 265
Splatting 188
214% 273 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 202%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 713 473 477 484 466 490 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
197% Outstanding
Read 1,838
Write 2,169
Mixed 1,601
SusWrite 517
344% 1,531 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 53.6
181% 65.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,029
DQ Write 594
DQ Mixed 798
598% 807 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 197%
Great: 387%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
715GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 478 478 479 477 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 451
Mixed 417
SusWrite 476
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 44.6
152% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 356
267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
2TB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 478 478 479 477 476 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 465
Mixed 366
SusWrite 476
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 47.2
154% 53.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 113%
Great: 128%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0342
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 116 117 117 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 126
Write 121
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 116
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 31.5
103% 36.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 28.8
86% 30.2 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 101%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5BB4 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 4,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback