Asus Z170-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170-A  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840x2160x4294967296 szín,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '16 at 11:32
Run Duration369 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.2
1-Core 138
2-Core 275
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 513
8-Core 761
79% 637 Pts
64-Core 761
47% 761 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
Asus(1043 04DF) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.134.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.3% Above average
Lighting 72.3
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 88.2
59% 74.5 fps
MRender 63.1
Gravity 62
Splatting 79.5
57% 68.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Read 504
Write 403
Mixed 415
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 22.2
130% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 38.7
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 25.5
59% 114 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
23GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 126
Mixed 129
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.15
61% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 113%
Sandisk Ultra Fit 31GB
5GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 41.5
Write 33.8
Mixed 37.3
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.91
4K Write 2.95
4K Mixed 1.31
404% 3.05 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 74%
Asmt 2115 250GB
4GB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 38.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 40.3
30% 39.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.3
89% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 39%
WD WD20EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
2GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 59
Write 61.2
Mixed 57.7
45% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.12
54% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$49
1GB free
Firmware: CC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 93.7
Write 91.9
Mixed 91.9
70% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.65
4K Mixed 0.28
64% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS723030BLE640 3TB
0GB free
Firmware: MX6OAAB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 134
107% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.21
100% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 104%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
0GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E5 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 89
Write 18.4
Mixed 76
47% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 1.79
4K Mixed 0.42
93% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
1GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 56.9
Write 66.5
Mixed 58.8
80% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.27
59% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$50
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 40.9
MC Mixed 33.4
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 44.5
SC Mixed 33.1
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 49.6
81% 49.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 107%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-A Builds (Compare 8,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-A - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback