Novatech BB-X000119

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Novatech BB-X000119 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte H81M-DS2V
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 11 '19 at 01:14
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4160-$79 48,506 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 176 72% 121 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 213 29% 214 Pts	64-Core 213 13% 213 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 2974) CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 418.91 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	52.9% Above average	Lighting 65.4 Reflection 70.2 Parallax 68 53% 67.9 fps	MRender 73.9 Gravity 63.6 Splatting 56.4 52% 64.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 240 Write 236 Mixed 217 52% 231 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 67.6 4K Mixed 42.4 138% 47.1 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 193 145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71 14,401 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 59GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 62 62 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	41% Average	Read 81.2 Write 77.2 Mixed 44.8 SusWrite 61.3 48% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 62%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB 8,875 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 14GB free Firmware: PB2OC60F SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 65 53 54 52 50 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 76.8 Write 72.2 Mixed 39.7 SusWrite 57.3 45% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 45%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$60 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 700GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 108 109 111 111 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Read 113 Write 114 Mixed 78.7 SusWrite 109 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 1315 CT51264BA160BJ.C8 8GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.3% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 15.3 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 15.4 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Novatech BB-X000119

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)