Asrock H370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H370M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 19 '19 at 19:14
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$395
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 150
2-Core 286
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 1,137
101% 857 Pts
64-Core 1,437
89% 1,437 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.9% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 104
Parallax 94.9
74% 96.5 fps
MRender 90.8
Gravity 85
Splatting 93
74% 89.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB
860GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 461 460 457 459 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 412
Write 400
Mixed 392
SusWrite 455
94% 415 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 45.7
159% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 200
186% 288 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 108%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
232GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 317 316 316 317 317 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 478
Mixed 373
SusWrite 334
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 57.7
197% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 117%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
901GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.2 1.8 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 187
Write 2.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 1.8
36% 49.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 109%
G-tech ArmorATD 1TB
913GB free
Firmware: 1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 120 122 121 122 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 166
Write 123
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 122
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.7
244% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 85%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
712GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 91.4
Write 66.6
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 96.3
101% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 45%
WDC WD60 0VE-08HDT0 60GB
29GB free, PID cb01
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 18
Mixed 17.8
SusWrite 18.5
27% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 13%
Sony QD-G120F 109GB
79GB free, PID 0c55
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 216 215 218 217 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 25.1
84% 29.6 GB/s
SC Read 20
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 53.9
74% 53.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H370M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 127% - Outstanding Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback