Asrock H370M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 100% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H370M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190319
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 04:18
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$395 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 93.6 1-Core 148 2-Core 284 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 595 8-Core 1100 101% 847 Pts	64-Core 1,439 89% 1,439 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466 261,508 User benchmarks, average bench 131% EVGA(3842 3081) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	106% Outstanding	Lighting 145 Reflection 227 Parallax 143 118% 172 fps	MRender 208 Gravity 164 Splatting 0.3 88% 124 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 139%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0B-00YS70 1TB 39,874 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 808GB free (System drive) Firmware: 401000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 436 445 429 446 443 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 376 Write 312 Mixed 389 SusWrite 429 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 36.6 4K Write 89.3 4K Mixed 44.2 159% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 195 181% 281 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 115%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 206GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 315 314 315 315 315 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 428 Mixed 375 SusWrite 332 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 92.5 4K Mixed 53.9 182% 62.9 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 346 261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 929GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.3 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 196 Write 0.7 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 0.5 36% 49.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 109%
G-tech ArmorATD 1TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 864GB free Firmware: 1024 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 118 117 117 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 158 Write 116 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 117 87% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.7 244% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 85%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB 14,954 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 658GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 91 91 91 91 90 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 89.5 Write 64 Mixed 53.6 SusWrite 89.2 98% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 111% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 45%
WDC WD60 0VE-08HDT0 60GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 29GB free, PID cb01 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.91% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 17.7 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 18.7 24% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.91% Great: 13%
SanDisk U3 Cruzer Micro 1GB 685 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 5406 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	4.37% Terrible	Read 17.2 Write 3.3 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 4.6 8% 7.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.37% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 25.9 87% 30.5 GB/s	SC Read 21 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 28.6 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	30	84.6"	1280 720	SAM0D42 SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H370M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H370M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	47x
Core i7-8700Intel $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	37x
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	33x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	14x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $85Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $31Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	15x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $69Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	11x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 127% - Outstanding

Total price: $230

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353