Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '19 at 17:12
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 141
58% 94.3 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 457
43% 357 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Lighting 73.8
Reflection 76
Parallax 65.6
60% 71.8 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 70.7
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 248 277 274 277 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 496
Write 248
Mixed 217
SusWrite 271
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 85.5
4K Mixed 40
141% 51.6 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 181
136% 184 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 129%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$42
27GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 84 72 64 61 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 458
Mixed 374
SusWrite 106
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 51.1
169% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 253
187% 245 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90%
Great: 114%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
12GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 55 134 32 130 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.4% Poor
Read 188
Write 88.3
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 86.1
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 10.8
46% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 14.5
DQ Write 15.7
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 85%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40
13GB free
Firmware: GF100-07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 56 45 42 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 52.9
Write 57.4
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 51.9
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 42%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
107GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 53 53 53 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 71.4
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 53
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 99U5471-020.A00LF 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback