| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 7.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | MSI MS-7522 |
| Motherboard | MSI X58A-GD65 (MS-7522) (all builds) |
| Memory | 17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100612 |
| Uptime | 1.8 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 17 '20 at 17:30 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.1%
Good
|
62% 101 Pts
|
37% 294 Pts
|
23% 369 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
PNY(196E 085A) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
7.92%
Terrible
|
7% 8.25 fps
|
9% 11.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Z400s 256GB-$221
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z2333000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 175 177 183 185 177 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
37% 164 MB/s
|
63% 26.2 MB/s
|
20% 40 MB/s
|
|
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 802GB
112GB free, PID 2336
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 26 27 27 27 MB/s
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
37% 27.2 MB/s
|
108% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
42.6%
Average
|
42% 14.7 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
59% 67.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X58A-GD65 (MS-7522) Builds (Compare 100 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI X58A-GD65 (MS-7522)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 46x |
| Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 12x |
| Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 9x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $219 |