Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 30BCCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 30BCCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1038
Memory5.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190426
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 22:36
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 130
52% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 430
41% 339 Pts
64-Core 743
46% 743 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 425.66
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.5% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 85.7
Parallax 73.5
53% 74.9 fps
MRender 81.1
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 87.2
69% 83.2 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 114 90 135 156 133 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 182
Write 112
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 128
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
930GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 178 180 179 181 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 166
Mixed 110
SusWrite 179
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.5% Poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 7.4
SC Mixed 5.1
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30BCCTO1WW Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: Lenovo 30BCCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback