Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 121% UFO	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 154% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	149% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	297% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	117.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200207
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Apr 19 '20 at 19:50
Run Duration	327 Seconds
Run User	GEO-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7980XE-$1,000 4,653 User benchmarks, average bench 80% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 77.8 1-Core 123 2-Core 244 81% 148 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 859 76% 645 Pts	64-Core 2,613 162% 2,613 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 95%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Asus(1043 8667) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	149% Outstanding	Lighting 204 Reflection 215 Parallax 227 166% 215 fps	MRender 247 Gravity 199 Splatting 132 151% 193 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 149% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1625 1598 1597 1429 1416 1411 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	297% Outstanding	Read 2127 Write 1,767 Mixed 1,594 SusWrite 1,513 393% 1,750 MB/s	4K Read 50.3 4K Write 132 4K Mixed 68.8 234% 83.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,185 DQ Write 929 DQ Mixed 1,024 775% 1,046 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 297% Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$86 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 931GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1432 1428 1437 1497 1461 1403 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	306% Outstanding	Read 2,140 Write 1,827 Mixed 1,676 SusWrite 1,443 398% 1,772 MB/s	4K Read 54.4 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 72.8 259% 94.9 MB/s	DQ Read 1,283 DQ Write 1,061 DQ Mixed 1,114 850% 1,153 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 306% Great: 410%
Samsung 860 DCT 1.92TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 1.5TB free Firmware: HXT72B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 474 475 458 458 458 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 471 Mixed 364 SusWrite 467 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 37.8 149% 57.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 281 231% 332 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 DCT 1.92TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 2TB free Firmware: HXT72B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 457 456 466 460 454 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 490 Write 470 Mixed 362 SusWrite 458 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 36.9 148% 57.3 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 282 232% 332 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95 7,966 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 175 176 173 178 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 159 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 176 107% 147 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 107%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$95 7,966 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 195 198 197 198 197 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 193 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 197 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$60 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 198 198 199 199 199 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 157 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 197 115% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot 3200 C16 Series 8x16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	102% Outstanding	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 53.3 MC Mixed 35.1 116% 40.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 11.1 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 163%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $206Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	497x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	262x
Core i7-7740XIntel $234Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	150x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	170x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	152x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	96x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	79x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	62x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	31x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $777

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16