Gigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics56% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160310
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMay 04 '20 at 08:17
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 90.2
1-Core 119
2-Core 244
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 643
71% 559 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 69.6
58% 70.4 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 55.6
52% 65 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
334GB free
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1364 1442 1438 1437 1443 1439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,741
Write 1,401
Mixed 688
SusWrite 1,427
294% 1,314 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 56.1
202% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 818
DQ Write 405
DQ Mixed 445
374% 556 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 246%
Great: 283%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 509 484 308 248 157 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
879GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 468 472 474 466 471 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 406
Mixed 394
SusWrite 465
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 56.4
164% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
216GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0 0.1 0.1 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 37
SusWrite 0.1
38% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 12%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68N32N0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 4.9 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.9 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
Read 39
Write 40.7
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 4.9
39% 29.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 15%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
171GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.5% Very poor
Read 39
Write 37.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 1.9
36% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 14%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.3% Poor
Read 38
Write 39.7
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 37.5
51% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
116% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 23
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 22.5
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 977 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170MX-Gaming 5 - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $711
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback