PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z800 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0AECh |
Memory | 18.1 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180305 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Jul 28 '20 at 05:29 |
Run Duration | 187 Seconds |
Run User | PER-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
61.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 451.48
|
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 72 92 86 87 98 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
2TB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 55 59 57 57 MB/s
|
38%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 197 193 197 198 198 MB/s
|
90.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST3000DM008-2DM166 2TB
3TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 152 149 152 151 149 MB/s
|
91.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
191GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 24 24 24 24 MB/s
|
13.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.5 5.6 5 5.2 5.2 MB/s
|
5.05%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 319x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 189x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 161x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 88x |
Quadro 5000NvidiaBench 10%, 751 samples | 68x |
SSD | |
---|---|
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples | 38x |
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples | 34x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |