Acer Veriton M2611G

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Veriton M2611G (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Veriton M2611G
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130114
Uptime	11.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '21 at 17:07
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 84.8 2-Core 169 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 279 41% 298 Pts	64-Core 315 20% 315 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250 25,802 User benchmarks, average bench 8% MSI(1462 3011) 2GB CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.12.1 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	8.24% Terrible	Lighting 10.6 Reflection 10.8 Parallax 14.2 9% 11.9 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 8.5 8% 9.17 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.24% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 232 238 239 239 236 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.9% Good	Read 247 Write 232 Mixed 221 SusWrite 236 53% 234 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 32.1 105% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 198 141% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 126GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 237 238 239 241 240 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.8% Good	Read 251 Write 239 Mixed 232 SusWrite 238 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 32.3 107% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 148 125% 182 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 333GB free Firmware: 50.0AB50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 77 76 76 76 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	46% Average	Read 84 Write 78.7 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 75.9 54% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 241GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 134 138 136 137 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 154 Write 132 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 136 91% 124 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 112%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 610GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.4 2.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	0.94% Terrible	Read 3 Write 2.2 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 2.3 3% 2.55 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.94% Great: 19%
Hitachi HUA722010CLA330 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 340GB free, PID fcbf Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 23 23 23 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.2% Very poor	Read 23 Write 19.8 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 23.3 28% 21 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 15%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GB 9,947 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 14.9 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.2 SC Mixed 14.4 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 70.8 56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Veriton M2611G Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M2611G

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	23x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	13x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	7x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	23x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	7x

SSD
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	5x
SD8SB8U128G1001 128GBSandiskBench 72%, 1,067 samples	3x
CV3-CE128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 65%, 121 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 6,798 samples	5x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 29%, 7,230 samples	5x
HU564404EP0200 1x4GBUnifosaBench 24%, 260 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $148

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16