ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '15 at 01:07
Run Duration	292 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 108 2-Core 215 73% 161 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 795 76% 630 Pts	64-Core 1,042 64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 63% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5582 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	35.1% Below average	Lighting 43.7 Reflection 39.6 Parallax 50.3 36% 44.5 fps	MRender 54.5 Gravity 37.5 Splatting 36.6 34% 42.8 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 248GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3835 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 204 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 21 (AE) Unknown 100 100 117 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4403 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 42 249109151786 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 3 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 8424506172 (F7) Unknown 100 100 265967376 (F8) Unknown 100 100 464855294	64.2% Good	Read 372 Write 339 Mixed 347 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 14.4 92% 35.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 69.5 DQ Mixed 14.2 20% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 107%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 16GB free Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 23538 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1647 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 83 83 527 (AE) Unknown 100 100 519 (B5) Unknown 100 100 17536485230586 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 80 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 1133 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 83 83 17 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0	50.6% Above average	Read 374 Write 186 Mixed 252 60% 271 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 66.7 4K Mixed 4.66 76% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 49.5 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 7.72 26% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 72%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 35888824 (03) Spinup time 95 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 37 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 231268 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 26 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 30 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 59 690225193 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 16 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 119 (C2) HDA temperature 41 41 107374182441 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 92 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 60026462928910 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2769981785 (F2) Unknown 100 253 6971575	94.1% Outstanding	Read 174 Write 155 Mixed 163 124% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.57 4K Mixed 0.23 86% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 455GB free Firmware: K2AOAD1A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 65537 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 103 103 68762731194 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 10136 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 176 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 68588 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1370 (C0) Power-off retract count 91 91 11878 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 91 91 11878 (C2) HDA temperature 107 107 266288496691 (C4) Reallocation count 95 95 253 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 3 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 271	31.2% Below average	Read 58.8 Write 49.8 Mixed 59.3 42% 56 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.72 4K Mixed 0.27 77% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 34%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 354GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 32 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 74 69 8135 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9505 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 30286 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 1 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2087 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 69 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 56 38 270583463980 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 30 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 236 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 1 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 9693	79.3% Very good	Read 129 Write 148 Mixed 132 102% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.84 4K Mixed 0.56 139% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 75%
Hitachi HDE721050SLA330 500GB 252 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 205GB free Firmware: ST3OA3AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 131 131 116 (03) Spinup time 130 130 25791889721 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 7985 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 125 125 33 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 43388 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1294 (C0) Power-off retract count 93 93 8564 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 93 93 8564 (C2) HDA temperature 130 130 257698824238 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	59.3% Above average	Read 101 Write 105 Mixed 109 80% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.67 4K Write 1.82 4K Mixed 0.46 113% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS725050KLA360 500GB-$40 5,497 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 24GB free Firmware: K2AOAD1A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 655366 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 108 108 68761551500 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4139 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 54033 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 643 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5437 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5437 (C2) HDA temperature 114 114 270583463984 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0	19.9% Very poor	Read 35 Write 34 Mixed 34.6 26% 34.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.27 65% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 34%
HDS72505 0KLA360 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 6GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.9% Very poor	Read 32 Write 31.5 Mixed 18.2 34% 27.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 1.71 4K Mixed 0.25 69% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 17%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,594 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 37%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $195Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	544x
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples	284x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	182x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	125x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	120x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	112x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	50x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	41x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	40x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 5,910 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	22x
RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 73%, 3,160 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $1,069

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback