Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200512
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 13 '21 at 22:15
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 64.9 1-Core 134 2-Core 237 79% 145 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 798 69% 592 Pts	64-Core 1,210 75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Performing below potential (64^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.3% Above average	Lighting 76.8 Reflection 74.6 Parallax 74.8 63% 75.4 fps	MRender 58.2 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 61.5 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 680GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 368 387 402 398 359 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 461 Write 374 Mixed 260 SusWrite 376 82% 368 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 35.4 116% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 184 143% 197 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 133%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 178GB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 148 150 154 157 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 132 Write 150 Mixed 113 SusWrite 152 101% 137 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 305% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 97%
USB3.0 1TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 916GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 37.8 Write 35.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 19.8 23% 30.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 102%
USB3.0 1TB 425 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 914GB free Firmware: 0101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 36.8 Write 37.6 Mixed 28.9 SusWrite 19.9 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 19 33 49 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	21.6% Poor	Read 43.5 Write 45.2 Mixed 60.2 SusWrite 31.3 34% 45 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 104%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 38 19 43 45 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 117 Write 108 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 33.3 54% 74.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 165% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 123GB 3,538 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 114GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 44 25 27 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 151 Write 48.8 Mixed 71.7 SusWrite 32.9 87% 76 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.4 170% 3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 24GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	36.4% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 12.8 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 8.5 25% 8.9 GB/s	Latency 114 35% 114 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $475

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,919x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,342x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1,106x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	1,105x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	880x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,148Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	612x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	847x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	707x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $154Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	421x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	434x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	187x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $82Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,752

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16