Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics9.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 09 '15 at 07:50
Run Duration352 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$80
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
79% 173 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 442
60% 446 Pts
64-Core 447
28% 447 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 79%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Gigabyte(1458 2551) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1046.0
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
9.08% Terrible
Lighting 9.83
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 13.5
8% 12.7 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 17.2
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.08%
Great: 9%
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250G (TurboPC EX) 250GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 416
Mixed 409
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 55
185% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 147
132% 209 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 114%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 EVO 250G (TurboPC EX) 250GB
37GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 83% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 154
Mixed 147
120% 159 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.15
69% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$45
1TB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 143
Mixed 149
117% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.16
68% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 113%
WD WD20EARS-00MVWB0 (TurboPC EX) 2TB
401GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 71
Mixed 66.6
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.86
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.22
93% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%
BUFFALO HD-PZU3 USB Device (TurboPC EX) 1TB
398GB free, PID 01f9
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
382% Outstanding
Read 84.8
Write 78.9
Mixed 57.3
92% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 0.18
3,903% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.72
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 0.42
6,988% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 382%
Great: 382%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -SD 8GB
4GB free, PID 8008
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 44.1
Write 11.5
Mixed 15.4
24% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.32
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.09
21% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 16%
Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 342 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback