HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory16 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 16 '21 at 15:26
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 135
2-Core 263
86% 158 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 696
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 648
40% 648 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.2% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.1
37% 41.6 fps
MRender 47.9
Gravity 41.6
Splatting 36.9
34% 42.1 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 810
Write 981
Mixed 580
177% 790 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 77.6
4K Mixed 37.6
124% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 713
506% 629 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
459GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 408 406 390 389 389 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 372
Mixed 356
SusWrite 392
86% 381 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 34.7
115% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 320
241% 321 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 133%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
876GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 408 407 390 390 389 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 422
Write 378
Mixed 354
SusWrite 392
87% 387 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 34.1
114% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 342
254% 336 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown W642GU42J9266N8 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 24.6
74% 25.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 28: 4R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 29% 34 310 238 60 31.5" 1920 1080 VIZ1022 E32-D1
History: Score 25: 2R 3G 6B | Score 28: 4R 1G 5B
Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback