Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 174%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 14 '21 at 23:39
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
101% 184 Pts
4-Core 578
8-Core 954
94% 766 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Lighting 240
Reflection 208
Parallax 256
196% 235 fps
MRender 275
Gravity 236
Splatting 176
182% 229 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 173%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT08B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 60 60 59 55 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 312
Write 73.5
Mixed 98.9
SusWrite 60.2
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 21
103% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 96
DQ Mixed 54
84% 167 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 85%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$122
100GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 488 350 248 238 232 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 472
Mixed 441
SusWrite 340
99% 438 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 61.5
209% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 347
265% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
74GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 470 352 265 191 200 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 474
Mixed 398
SusWrite 327
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 65.2
223% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 363
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 125%
Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
60GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2444
Write 2,103
Mixed 1,621
457% 2,056 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 96
319% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,526
DQ Write 1,158
DQ Mixed 1,294
981% 1,326 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
430GB free
Firmware: 04.06A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 167
Write 84
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 75.8
72% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 117%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
328GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 95 97 98 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 77.3
Write 74.3
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 97
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 40.8
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 32.9
113% 39.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.9
SC Write 50.7
SC Mixed 34.5
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,056
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback