Inversenet FRONTIER

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	71.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 22 months ago.

System	Inversenet FRONTIER (all builds)
Motherboard	ASRock AB350 Pro4
Memory	26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180629
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '21 at 16:30
Run Duration	464 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Memory 77.2 1-Core 128 2-Core 254 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 916 85% 710 Pts	64-Core 1,266 78% 1,266 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$238 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.39 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Lighting 92.5 Reflection 91.4 Parallax 84.6 75% 89.5 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 81.1 Splatting 73.3 71% 89.3 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA1000CM10003 1TB 7,008 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 727GB free (System drive) Firmware: STRSD013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 417 486 487 456 473 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.3% Very good	Read 294 Write 332 Mixed 311 SusWrite 454 79% 348 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 13.4 63% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 180 168% 259 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 136%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 136 137 138 135 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	81.1% Excellent	Read 147 Write 128 Mixed 94.3 SusWrite 136 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 81.1% Great: 96%
SABRENT 1TB 2,168 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 495GB free Firmware: 1214 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 30 30 30 29 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 9441 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 54 56 57 57 57 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 99.9 Write 108 Mixed 75 SusWrite 56.1 63% 84.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2TB free Firmware: 7205 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 36 37 37 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 106 Write 129 Mixed 122 SusWrite 36.3 74% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 3.7 4K Mixed 0.7 476% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 90%
Apacer Portable HDD 4TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1TB free, PID c004 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 67 67 67 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 94.3 Write 127 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 67.2 124% 91 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 174% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 57%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 4TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 87 92 89 90 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.5% Above average	Read 174 Write 173 Mixed 135 SusWrite 89.5 188% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.1 137% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 54%
Logitec 6TB 2TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 175 185 177 180 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	75.3% Very good	Read 140 Write 152 Mixed 133 SusWrite 178 210% 151 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.9 218% 4.3 MB/s

WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2.5TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 11 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.2% Above average	Read 166 Write 152 Mixed 115 SusWrite 13 140% 112 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.7 372% 7.33 MB/s	DQ Read 0.3 DQ Write 9.3 DQ Mixed 0.5 334% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 57.2% Great: 63%
Apacer Portable HDD 4TB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free, PID c004 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 39 39 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Read 92 Write 81.5 Mixed 53.5 SusWrite 39.6 85% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 0.7 282% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 57%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 11 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	57.4% Above average	Read 180 Write 161 Mixed 109 SusWrite 12.9 144% 116 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 0.8 347% 4.5 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 9.5 DQ Mixed 0.6 345% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 63%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 87 92 89 90 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	52.1% Above average	Read 166 Write 172 Mixed 127 SusWrite 89.5 184% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 54%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 0.2 0.1 0 0.2 1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 102 Write 120 Mixed 96.9 SusWrite 0.5 104% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 213% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 73%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 34 34 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41% Average	Read 120 Write 139 Mixed 123 SusWrite 34.7 139% 104 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.7 206% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 41%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.9% Below average	Read 135 Write 167 Mixed 136 SusWrite 11.7 149% 112 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.8 206% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 42%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB 1.5TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 35 34 34 35 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.6% Below average	Read 99.2 Write 128 Mixed 107 SusWrite 34.5 125% 92 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.6 189% 3.33 MB/s

WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 36 35 34 46 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.6% Below average	Read 119 Write 120 Mixed 102 SusWrite 37 124% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 54%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 3TB free, PID 0192 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 101 101 100 100 101 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 154 Write 149 Mixed 133 SusWrite 99 179% 134 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.7 208% 4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 2x16GB 1,277 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 36.7 MC Write 32.7 MC Mixed 30.6 95% 33.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.9 SC Write 35.5 SC Mixed 28.6 87% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 85.9 47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 93%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FRONTIER Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 110%

UFO

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 92%

Nuclear submarine

System: Inversenet FRONTIER

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	4x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	3x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $488Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	5x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	4x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	3x
670p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $75Bench 251%, 14,932 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
CBD32D4U2S8ME-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 93%, 9 samples	4x
CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 80%, 5,285 samples	2x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GBCorsair $74Bench 76%, 29,684 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $742

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16