Asrock B550 PG Riptide

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics73.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B550 PG Riptide  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210809
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 08:53
Run Duration465 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 79.4
1-Core 165
2-Core 336
102% 193 Pts
4-Core 658
8-Core 962
101% 810 Pts
64-Core 1067
66% 1067 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 8D94) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.4% Very good
Lighting 94.2
Reflection 92.6
Parallax 85.9
77% 90.9 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 60.5
67% 85.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
784GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 48 51 251 448 358 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 502
Write 454
Mixed 415
SusWrite 261
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 22.1
115% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 158
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 1.2
66% 155 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 100%
Suneast SE900 SSD 1024GB
634GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 350 356 365 369 369 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 390
Write 390
Mixed 308
SusWrite 362
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 16.7
69% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 91.8
81% 120 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 132 132 137 137 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 129
Write 134
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 133
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9441
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 61 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 90.1
Write 114
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 62.2
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.6
223% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
2TB free
Firmware: 7205
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 32 33 33 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 153
Write 152
Mixed 106
SusWrite 33.4
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
479% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 90%
Apacer Portable HDD 4TB
615GB free, PID c004
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 63 66 66 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 57.5
Write 71
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 65.1
94% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 57%
Apacer Portable HDD 4TB
935GB free, PID c004
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 63 62 65 65 66 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 71.1
Write 106
Mixed 57.6
SusWrite 63.8
103% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.5
322% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 0.5
382% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 57%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66% Good
Read 189
Write 158
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 16.8
140% 115 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 0.9
421% 5.17 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 1
407% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 66%
Great: 66%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 34 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.6% Good
Read 180
Write 160
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 34
142% 115 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.7
350% 4.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 0.5
338% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 63%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
2TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.4% Below average
Read 114
Write 164
Mixed 140
SusWrite 16.8
148% 109 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.9
205% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 41%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
2TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 141
Write 160
Mixed 131
SusWrite 16.8
147% 112 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
206% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 73%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00SF3B0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.5% Good
Read 205
Write 168
Mixed 109
SusWrite 16.8
152% 125 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1
422% 6.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 0.9
455% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 66%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
891GB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 33 34 34 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
Read 131
Write 170
Mixed 123
SusWrite 34
153% 114 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
206% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 101 98 101 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
Read 160
Write 158
Mixed 123
SusWrite 101
180% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 54%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 101 98 101 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.7% Very good
Read 192
Write 160
Mixed 126
SusWrite 100
187% 145 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 9
4K Mixed 0.8
356% 5.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 9.5
DQ Mixed 0.7
349% 3.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 63%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
2TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 50 51 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.1% Average
Read 135
Write 137
Mixed 137
SusWrite 50.4
153% 115 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
169% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 52%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
1.5TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 51 51 50 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 157
Write 152
Mixed 122
SusWrite 50.4
156% 120 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.7
205% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 73%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
1.5TB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
Read 100
Write 140
Mixed 114
SusWrite 50.4
139% 101 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.8
215% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 41%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
746GB free, PID 0192
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.3% Average
Read 140
Write 162
Mixed 130
SusWrite 50.4
161% 120 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.8
210% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8266.C16FD1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 34.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 30.9
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 33.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 20 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical B550 PG Riptide Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 PG Riptide

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $550
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback