Acer Aspire TC-780

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-780  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-780(KBL)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '22 at 19:26
Run Duration427 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 90.9
1-Core 121
2-Core 230
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 672
69% 555 Pts
64-Core 665
41% 665 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.7% Very good
Lighting 96.8
Reflection 107
Parallax 99.1
79% 101 fps
MRender 96
Gravity 95.9
Splatting 94.9
78% 95.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 SSD 512GB
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0121A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 363 366 366 372 380 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 473
Write 337
Mixed 393
SusWrite 368
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 63.2
4K Mixed 18.4
94% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 29
65% 131 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 96%
ST10000NM001G-2MW103 10TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 177 179 180 181 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 186
Write 180
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 175
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 1.2
43% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 5
DQ Write 19.7
DQ Mixed 2.9
5% 9.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
2TB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 122 120 120 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 98.3
Write 128
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 120
68% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.7
246% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 90%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 40.3
Write 37.8
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 41.3
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
336% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 88%
Huh72808 0ALE601 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: A4GL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 138
Write 144
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 43.2
72% 98 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 105%
Huh72808 0ALE601 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: A4GL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 198
Write 189
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 43.3
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.9
194% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 105%
Seagate ST8000NM0105 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 12% Great: 132%
Hus72606 0ALE611 6TB
3TB free
Firmware: APGL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 155
Write 152
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 43.2
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
216% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 99 103 105 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 88
Write 137
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 103
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 76.C102G.D170B 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 25.5
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-780 Builds (Compare 1,610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-780

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback