Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics61.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '17 at 20:42
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 210
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 773
67% 571 Pts
64-Core 977
60% 977 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
61.4% Good
Lighting 77
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 75.2
63% 76 fps
MRender 73.1
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 71.5
59% 71.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
1TB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 1,899
Write 56.1
Mixed 110
144% 688 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 2.47
58% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 283%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 141
Write 117
Mixed 88
86% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.98
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.24
105% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 92%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 152
Write 121
Mixed 71.5
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.24
96% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 92%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
873GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 116
Write 130
Mixed 20.8
64% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.72
4K Mixed 0.23
85% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 92%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
811GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 145
Mixed 60.2
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.11
4K Write 2.26
4K Mixed 0.23
114% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 92%
Asmt 2115 6TB
466GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 199
Mixed 128
123% 165 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.55
114% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 44
MC Mixed 45.8
129% 45 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 22.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 98%
This bench: 113%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $700
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback