EVGA 151-HE-E999

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics96.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemEVGA Default string
MotherboardEVGA 151-HE-E999  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '23 at 19:21
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$190
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 215
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 421
8-Core 683
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 868
54% 868 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 129
Parallax 121
99% 124 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 127
Splatting 112
91% 111 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 350 337 336 340 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1215
Write 800
Mixed 988
SusWrite 336
186% 835 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 57
4K Mixed 47.8
154% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 344
275% 395 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 136%
Great: 340%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$70
142GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 170 169 168 180 175 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 460
Write 275
Mixed 312
SusWrite 171
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 36.3
121% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 202
173% 253 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 118%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 151 148 150 150 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 162
Write 148
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 149
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
57GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 68 66 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 65.6
Write 66.6
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 66.6
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 86%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 57 55 77 47 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 120
Write 76.2
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 64.7
65% 87.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 130 129 132 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 147
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 129
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
366% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion Desk 6TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 127 126 122 124 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 86.8
Write 90
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 124
70% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.6
234% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 89%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
844GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 76 78 87 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 119
Write 128
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 79.6
141% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 62%
SAMSUNG HD103UJ 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 74 76 78 88 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 105
Write 46.3
Mixed 56.1
SusWrite 78.9
90% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%
WDC WD50 EZRZ-32GZ5B1 5TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.1 0.9 1 0.7 0.3 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Read 103
Write 108
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 2
98% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 58%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 1.1 1.4 1.1 1.6 0.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 152
Write 148
Mixed 108
SusWrite 1.5
129% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3000 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 34.4
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 151-HE-E999 Builds (Compare 157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: EVGA 151-HE-E999

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $523
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback