Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

13 months ago, 13 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel N95 1,411 User benchmarks, average bench 49% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	29.3% Poor	Memory 27.7 1-Core 82.4 2-Core 150 45% 86.9 Pts	4-Core 167 8-Core 235 25% 201 Pts	64-Core 176 11% 176 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 811 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4146 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	3.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 2.5 3% 3.63 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 4.8 Splatting 3.9 4% 5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.23% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FPT310M8SSD256G 256GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 195GB free (System drive) Firmware: HAFEB2.1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 303 Write 148 Mixed 144 43% 198 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 19.9 4K Mixed 15.2 57% 17.6 MB/s	DQ Read 40.6 DQ Write 40.9 DQ Mixed 34.5 28% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.4% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 9.6 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.8 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 9 23% 8 GB/s	Latency 269 15% 269 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	497x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	486x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	468x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,381x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	495x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	357x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87