Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '23 at 18:39
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
48.8% Average
Memory 52.7
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 140
50% 89.3 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 264
35% 261 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4338
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.1
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.73 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5
Splatting 5.7
5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M8SSD256G 256GB
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 275 327 284 323 336 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Read 322
Write 201
Mixed 203
SusWrite 313
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 30.6
100% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 178
156% 230 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
280GB free
Firmware: D005SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 58 60 53 61 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 80
Write 80.5
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 57.6
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 11
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 22" 1280 720 DEL403B DELL 2208WFP
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,823 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback