Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus X99-DELUXE

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170330
Uptime	9.4 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '20 at 12:04
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$189 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 88.7 1-Core 99 2-Core 200 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 395 8-Core 690 66% 543 Pts	64-Core 1,066 66% 1,066 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Asus(1043 0468) ≥ 4GB CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	18.4% Very poor	Lighting 21 Reflection 21.8 Parallax 22.5 17% 21.8 fps	MRender 27 Gravity 21.3 Splatting 27.5 21% 25.2 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 432 404 134 88 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 474 Mixed 434 SusWrite 242 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 36.9 4K Write 71.3 4K Mixed 47.7 155% 52 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 300 DQ Mixed 340 254% 340 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$91 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 0GB free Firmware: CC24 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 44.5 Write 30.5 Mixed 45 30% 40 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 133GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 100 100 100 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 73 Write 66.2 Mixed 43 SusWrite 98.8 51% 70.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 83%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 107GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 70 63 100 113 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 96 Write 100 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 83.1 63% 86.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$80 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 94GB free Firmware: CC52 SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 72 74 73 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	49.7% Average	Read 101 Write 82.8 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 72.1 59% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 96%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 50GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 62 61 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Read 80.2 Write 81.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 62.4 96% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 32%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 290GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	17.8% Very poor	Read 86.8 Write 89.3 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 1.8 71% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 40%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 109GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 0 0 0 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	11.7% Very poor	Read 42.7 Write 48.3 Mixed 39 SusWrite 0.7 42% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.7% Great: 40%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 77GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 62 63 64 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 71 Write 69.7 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 61.7 86% 63.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 40%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 13GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 0 0 0 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 67 Write 67.8 Mixed 77.5 SusWrite 0.5 70% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 86% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 53%
WDC WD10 EACS-00D6B1 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 75.5 Write 73.8 Mixed 54.5 85% 67.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 40%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 109GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 0.2 0.2 0 0.2 0.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 63.3 Write 62.7 Mixed 55.8 SusWrite 1 58% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 32%
WDC WD10 02FAEX-00Z3A0 1TB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 6GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 0 0 0 0 0.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.7% Very poor	Read 61 Write 60 Mixed 68.2 SusWrite 0.3 62% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 78% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13.7% Great: 53%
WD My Passport 0741 2TB 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1TB free, PID 0741 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 94 96 94 95 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 96.3 Write 98 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 94.3 116% 86.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C15 4x4GB 2,538 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	64.4% Good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 21 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 18.5 SC Mixed 18.6 49% 17 GB/s	Latency 68.8 58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-DELUXE Builds (Compare 1,965 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-DELUXE - $349

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	875x
Core i7-5930KIntel $116Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	492x
Core i7-5960XIntel $189Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	293x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	156x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $237Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	144x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	130x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	83x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $116Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GBCorsair $115Bench 88%, 5,380 samples	40x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C16 4x4GBCorsair $210Bench 88%, 3,970 samples	33x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsair $70Bench 85%, 8,498 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $874

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400