Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH Z77

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH Z77  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121219
Uptime17.7 Days
Run DateMay 05 '20 at 20:16
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$70
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 91.7
1-Core 115
2-Core 230
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 437
59% 442 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 23
Parallax 18.6
16% 20.5 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 25.9
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 960GB-$740
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 226 150 236 100 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.3% Good
Read 253
Write 239
Mixed 220
SusWrite 173
50% 221 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 28.8
111% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 206
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 144
122% 179 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 103%
WDC WD10 EADS-00M2B0 1TB
162GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 25.3
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 23
34% 25.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 32%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
69GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 3.1 2.9 3 3 2.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.93% Terrible
Read 30.5
Write 25.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 2.9
26% 20.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.93%
Great: 48%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB
239GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.5% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 26
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 0
25% 19.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH Z77 Builds (Compare 2,609 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH Z77 - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback